We must act quickly to prevent these worst-case scenarios, and we should begin by rethinking our energy sources. Currently, we rely almost exclusively on fossil fuel and nuclear energy production methods, which accelerate climate change while contaminating our water resources with ionizing radiation, heavy metals and chemical pollution. In addition, these established energy production methods rely on a steady and reliable supply of water. In fact, the Department of Energy confirms energy production is the second highest water user in the country, exceeded only by agriculture. As global warming worsens and droughts becomes more common, our existing power plants may not be able to secure enough water to support energy production.
The IPCC warns that we must decrease our greenhouse gas emissions 80% by 2050 in order to avoid the worst effects of global warming. We can reach this goal by developing a new energy economy and the policies to support this move. We must:
As we develop a new energy economy, we will face challenging decisions about energy production and consumption. Our current fossil fuel driven energy industry contributes daily to accelerating global warming through the emissions of climate-altering gases. These same power plants taint our drinking water and damage essential habitats with heavy metals and chemical pollution. Finally, global warming has already begun to affect our water supplies, which will only become more limited. This means we must identify energy sources that are not dependent upon consistent, reliable water supplies. In fact, many of our current energy sources will no longer be available as water grows scarcer.
Approximately half of U.S. electricity is generated by coal burning power plants. A typical 500 megawatt coal power plant uses more than 2 billion gallons of water each year. This water is used to wash coal, cool the power plant, drive power-generating turbines and clean emissions. In total, there are more than 500 coal-burning power plants located throughout the United States, which rely on more than 1 trillion gallons of water every year.
Advocates of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for power plants see it as a way to continue to burn fossil fuels like coal while meeting restrictions on heat-trapping carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution. The capture and storage processes pose very real challenges to water resources, and there are other natural resource and public health considerations. It is imperative that potential impacts of these processes are understood and that strict government policies are in place before commercialization of this technology. To learn more:
Nuclear power plants, which supply approximately 20% of U.S. electricity, use billions of gallons of water every day to absorb excess heat, maintain safe operating temperatures and drive steam-powered turbines. As environmental water levels drop due to climate change, drought or increased competing demand, many nuclear reactors may not be able to harvest sufficient quantities of water. 24 of the United States' 104 active nuclear reactors are sited in regions experiencing severe drought. Already, the Tennessee Valley Authority was forced to temporarily shut down an Alabama-based nuclear plant due to water restrictions during summer 2007.
One gallon of corn-based ethanol, which relies heavily on irrigation and chemical fertilizers, requires more than 1,000 gallons of water to produce and dramatically increases water pollution via runoff.
You will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader properly installed to view PDF documents. You can get it free from Adobe.